Homelessness is an induced problem,so the real answer to homelessness is the why question.
I present the mad housers and the problems that come up when they present their very simple solutions to homelessness.
The why question is this: who stands to profit the most from homelessness?
Have we evolved from being subjects of a King or Fiefdom or is that really part of an illusion?
does deconstrucion reveal…a regression?
that question again-who stands to make the most profit from homelessness?
“(1) supportive services coupled with permanent housing, particularly when combined with effective discharge from institutions, especially mental hospitals; “
Wait, I thought deinstitutionalization started in 1963, where has HUD been?
Now what solution for the homelessness is cheaper-the HUD approach or the Mad Houser approach?
(with land ownership)
interp.: Narcissus and Echo are not the problem-that’s a controlled situation with predictive results but the viewer of the painting being intimidated by Nemisis really is part of the problem.
General Zod gives us a multiple choice
General Zod on intimidation: