“Response to Television Show Depicting Illegal Pesticide Human Study”

EPA
http://www.epa.gov/oppfead1/guidance/response-to-human-study.htm
“In February 2006 EPA issued a tough new regulation governing human testing for pesticides by pesticide companies and other parties not affiliated with the government. Our rule put in place the nation’s strongest protections for subjects in third-party research, including:

* A prohibition against research involving intentional dosing of pregnant women, nursing women, or children;
* A prohibition against EPA relying on such testing in its decisions under the pesticide laws; and
* A requirement that all new intentional dosing human studies on non-pregnant, non-nursing adults be reviewed by EPA and a panel of independent experts for ethical and scientific acceptability.”

“Protections for Subjects in Human Subjects Research with Pesticides”
http://www.epa.gov/oppfead1/guidance/human-test.htm

“Closing Loopholes in the Federal Research Regulations: Some Practical Problems”
David B. Resnik, JD, PhD
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2650234/

*How many subjects of research injury end up with mental illness?

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s